<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Value of Genre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.art-machine.org/on-the-value-of-genre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.art-machine.org/on-the-value-of-genre/</link>
	<description>Just another former infatuation junkie</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thud</title>
		<link>http://www.art-machine.org/on-the-value-of-genre/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Thud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.art-machine.org/?p=1048#comment-761</guid>
		<description>It certainly makes browsing horror more difficult. I've assumed that the absence of a "Horror" section demonstrates a weakness in the market or product. They can't sell as Horror, so they'll pop it in generic and see if anyone picks it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly makes browsing horror more difficult. I&#8217;ve assumed that the absence of a &#8220;Horror&#8221; section demonstrates a weakness in the market or product. They can&#8217;t sell as Horror, so they&#8217;ll pop it in generic and see if anyone picks it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
