<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Myth of Perpetual Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.art-machine.org/the-myth-of-perpetual-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.art-machine.org/the-myth-of-perpetual-copyright/</link>
	<description>Just another former infatuation junkie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:19:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: primecog</title>
		<link>http://www.art-machine.org/the-myth-of-perpetual-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>primecog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.art-machine.org/?p=1239#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a victim of that policy, too, Alex. In fact, I had a store refuse to sell me the photos even when I had written permission to duplicate them. It was one of those &quot;scan your photo&quot; kiosks, and I had waited an hour to get some quick prints of my headshots. They took one look at them when I went to pay, and without asking or waiting for an explanation, they creased them, tore them, and threw them into the garbage. *Then* they said, &quot;Sorry, we can&#039;t sell you those.&quot;

And I second Bound By Law. It&#039;s focused primarily on documentary work, but it&#039;s got some great general material that everybody should know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a victim of that policy, too, Alex. In fact, I had a store refuse to sell me the photos even when I had written permission to duplicate them. It was one of those &#8220;scan your photo&#8221; kiosks, and I had waited an hour to get some quick prints of my headshots. They took one look at them when I went to pay, and without asking or waiting for an explanation, they creased them, tore them, and threw them into the garbage. <strong>Then</strong> they said, &#8220;Sorry, we can&#8217;t sell you those.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I second Bound By Law. It&#8217;s focused primarily on documentary work, but it&#8217;s got some great general material that everybody should know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.art-machine.org/the-myth-of-perpetual-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.art-machine.org/?p=1239#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>Simple, easy to read source on copyright, written by a Duke Law professor is  Bound by Law: Tales from the Public Domain, http://www.amazon.com/Bound-Law-Tales-Public-Domain/dp/B0025KVO62/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1244684857&amp;sr=8-3.  This myth about copyright is particularly nefarious when companies try to bully people who don&#039;t know better.  Walgreen&#039;s, for example, likes to pretend that people don&#039;t have the right to make copies of photos that those people had a studio make, when in fact, copyright clearly states (unless a contract is written that makes it otherwise) that works-for-hire belong to the person who commissions them, not the person who carries out the commission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple, easy to read source on copyright, written by a Duke Law professor is  Bound by Law: Tales from the Public Domain, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bound-Law-Tales-Public-Domain/dp/B0025KVO62/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1244684857&#038;sr=8-3" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Bound-Law-Tales-Public-Domain/dp/B0025KVO62/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1244684857&#038;sr=8-3</a>.  This myth about copyright is particularly nefarious when companies try to bully people who don&#8217;t know better.  Walgreen&#8217;s, for example, likes to pretend that people don&#8217;t have the right to make copies of photos that those people had a studio make, when in fact, copyright clearly states (unless a contract is written that makes it otherwise) that works-for-hire belong to the person who commissions them, not the person who carries out the commission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: occasional fish &#187; Tuesday various</title>
		<link>http://www.art-machine.org/the-myth-of-perpetual-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>occasional fish &#187; Tuesday various</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.art-machine.org/?p=1239#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>[...] on the myth of perpetual copyright: Copyright hawks and lawsuit-happy professional organizations like the MPAA and RIAA have created a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the myth of perpetual copyright: Copyright hawks and lawsuit-happy professional organizations like the MPAA and RIAA have created a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
